13 November 2005

Send in the clowns

Filed under: Culture, Borat - KZBlog @ 8:26 am

Borat first came to my attention when a Kazakh friend of mine was asked, very apologetically, if she had heard of him. She hadn’t and the guy sent her an article from the New Yorker from the Kazakh Embassy in Washington. My reaction then was probably typical of most Americans: What’s the big deal? This guy is yet another in a long line of shock-comics. I’ve never found this sort of thing funny but it was obvious he had no connection to Kazakhstan and it wasn’t clear where the harm was. I was slightly amused by the fact that Vassilenko, the Embassy spokesperson was reluctant to admit that one of the traditional sports of Kazakhstan, kokpar, involves using a headless goat or sheep carcass as a ball. It has been noted that Kazakhstan as a nation wants desperately to be taken seriously, however trying to disown genuine traditions is not necessarily the best path to that. There is no shame in Janybek never having closed negotiations for a joint venture with Adidas in the 16th century.

Borat returned to my attention after I had spent a year in Kazakhstan, and was at a housewarming party. Two guys started asking me if I had heard of Borat and if what he said was true. I told them it wasn’t in any way based on truth but they insisted that he wouldn’t have named Kazakhstan and just made everything up. I explained that the joke apparently was on ignorant Westerners willing to believe that other nations are primitive. One of them pointed out that the USSR was known to be anti-Semitic (this was after this Borat stunt) and Kazakhstan probably was too. I pointed out that half the world had a history of anti-Semitism. They pressed—granted we were at a party and drinking and all that. I began to get annoyed, especially when they pressed on the question of women and how Borat’s “traditional” costumes were very revealing and how could it then be that traditional Kazakh dress is very modest? Surely, Kazakh women were sluts. I was furious when one of them revealed that he was Ukrainian, born in the USSR. He asked me about the Russian of Kazakhs. I didn’t understand and he switched to Russian:

“I’m saying that I think they speak Russian differently in Kazakhstan, incorrectly, and you probably don’t understand what I am saying right now.”
“I understand perfectly. Of course it’s the same Russian,” I answered.

The idea that a guy from the Ukraine was calling all Kazakhs uneducated, slutty, and primitive got my goatHa ha ha a bit. I began to see the harm in Borat, not necessarily as starting these sorts of stereotypes because human nature is what it is and we like to stereotype, but as adding to it, giving people more material.

Borat has now returned to national attention as host of the MTV Europe Music Awards. In the course of the events, he brought out the “President of Kazakhstan,” and referred to him by the name of the actual President, Nursultan Nazarbayev. Apparently as the “President’ was giving a speech, Borat told people it was forbidden to speak while the President was speaking. Other offences included the president not looking Kazakh—in fact Borat’s whole entourage and style is much more Arabian/Persian than Kazakh. This created an outrage in a nation where it is against the law to dishonor or discredit the President and where generally authority figures and most especially the first President are held in greater reverence than most Westerners would be comfortable with. There are at least two places in the country where a gold cast of the President’s hand is preserved and people come and put their hand in the handprint and get their photo taken. Quotations of his adorn many other monuments and public art. Nonetheless we should note that there are hardly photos of the President’s face everywhere (except right now, because of the upcoming election), no one swears allegiance to the cult of the emperor, and the nation is devoid of other bits of silliness we see in far more authoritarian states.

I do understand the outrage, though calls to bring Borat to the international court are a bit extreme—can you imagine dragging to court everyone who ever forwarded an email with funny pictures of Bush or the guys who make the Bushism books? And Kazakhs themselves have no problems making fun of Bush—pointing out his resemblance to a monkey, criticizing harshly his politics, and always favorably comparing their own President. There is a whiff of “you can give it out, but you can’t take it” in the air.

An anecdotal survey of blogs by Kazakhs suggests that most active users are young-given the amount of slang used-and heavily into music, dance clubs, and the latest fads. Differentiating them from their American counterparts not at all. The mobilization—granted in the tens of people it would seem, not the hundreds—to the defense of their nation and their President is atypical of American teens. Conservative blogs abound with defenses of Bush against liberals and Democrats, but not so much against foreign attacks on his character or public portrayal. Yet in a short time we have this article attacking MTV, and somewhat gratuitously citing America as the source of evil, since presumably the MTV Europe branch has some autonom;, this new community which is allegedly a fan site, but on the creators’ own journal the words Borat Sucks Cock are fairly noticeable even to the non-Russian speaker.

Meanwhile a statement from the officials courtesy of RFE/FL< a href="http://www.rferl.org/featuresarticle/2005/11/bc8819f5-9eee-4220-b2e2-3e6ad0dcb131.html">claims that Baron Sascha Cohen is mentally ill and many of my colleagues have cited the fact that he changes his name so often—Ali G, Borat—as a sign that he is 1) not to be trusted and 2) ashamed that he is Jewish which in and of itself means that he is 2a) a traitor to his own people and 2b) hiding something. The fact that he is a performer with characters appears to have been missed. I have no desire to watch Borat, I don’t think he’s particularly funny and I do believe he does damage to the nation in the world that perhaps is most harmed by these sorts of attacks. The Kazakh pride is immeasurable (and rightly so for everyone should have some pride for their identity and nation) and these sorts of misrepresentations seem almost custom-made to pierce that pride at its most vulnerable points. However it is sad that the most reasonable answers seem to have come from kids on a blog somewhere: Ignore him or write an angry letter. And defend your pride in the face of slightly drunk Ukrainians at cocktail parties!

EDIT: This rather concise letter from a Jewish man in Kazakhstan also smacks of reason and an awesome little graphic showing Kazakh fluency in the minutia of American culture.

7 Comments »

The URI to TrackBack this entry is: http://kazakhstan.blogsome.com/2005/11/13/send-in-the-clowns-4/trackback/

  1. New Kazakhstan Blog

    Through Technorati, I find the interesting and promising KZ-Blog. The first post is dedicated to ‘Borat’ aka Ali G (whose EMA appearance we discussed here). The author of the blog provides us with some great insights into the Kazakh respon…

    Trackback by kazakhstan.neweurasia.net — 13 November 2005 @ 2:49 pm

  2. Kazakhstan: Public Enemy

    A Kazakh official says that his government does not rule out the possibility of bringing charges against Sacha Bara Cohen a.k.a. Ali G because of his character, Borat, who poses as a Kazakh. KZblog discusses the reactions to Borat in Kazakhstan.

    Trackback by Global Voices Online — 14 November 2005 @ 9:54 pm

  3. Dear Author,
    I can’t agree more with you on this whole “Borat” ordeal. I did laugh at his show. However, not because of his insults, but because those ignorant officials who ACTUALLY believed he was from Kazakhstan! I understand that critisizing shows should exist and I believe in a free press and all, but he is taking it TOO far!

    I especially liked your comment about the Ukranian extremely dumb person, who harrassed you with all his stupid questions about Kazakhstan. I came across with a few myself, so I always take the time to “put them into their place”, by pointing out their enourmous ignorance.

    Thank you for all your hard work. I would be very happy to help you with your noble pursuit of creating Encyclopedia Kazakhia and other projects.

    Let me know.

    Comment by Yenlik — 14 November 2005 @ 10:59 pm

  4. Great post. I remember reading this article in the Guardian, where they asked people in Almaty about Borat in 2003:

    But Borat hardly touches on the real Kazakhstan, so as Ulan, 32, puts it: “It’s just comedy really.”

    Ainura, 25, recently spent a year living in the US. Does she think Borat is giving Kazakhstan a bad name. “Borat’s not making fun of Kazakhs, he’s making fun of Americans,” she says. “They are gullible. Not one of them said, ‘No way - that can’t be true.’ The show describes a US stereotype, not a Kazakh one. It lays bare the American attitude towards foreigners: strong accents, loud voices, stupidity, male chauvinism.”

    Granted, it was 2 years ago and just “man on the street” reactions, but Ainura has it nailed.

    Any thoughts on the death of Zaman Nurkadilov?

    Comment by davesgonechina — 15 November 2005 @ 1:25 am

  5. I found your blog by way of Nathan Hamm’s Registan. It looks like a good start. Slavic chauvanism towards Kazakhs and others isn’t anything new and does not surprise me. Nor does it surprise me that Americans would buy into Slavic stereotypes of Kazakhs.

    Comment by Otto Pohl — 15 November 2005 @ 3:41 pm

  6. These “Kazakhstanis Against Borat” need to get a life.

    Comment by kazakhstan — 22 November 2005 @ 5:01 pm

  7. Just letting you know: kazakhs in general are most tolerant,hospitable nation.
    They are very patriotic, and value a lot their rich traditions and customs, have deep respect for their mother and father, old people and their ancestors. they have their unbreakable moral values.
    They [kazakh people] brough these traditions and values through centuries and I hope they would not lose it in future.

    Comment by Nazgul — 5 November 2006 @ 2:31 am

RSS feed for comments on this post.

Leave a comment

Line and paragraph breaks automatic, e-mail address never displayed, HTML allowed: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>


Get free blog up and running in minutes with Blogsome
Theme designed by Alex King