OK, this post has nothing to do with Kazakhstan per se and the story is already 2 years old. But 2008 marked the 50th anniversary of Boris Pasternak winning the Nobel Prize in Literature for Dr. Zhivago. Because the Nobel Prize committee seals its records for 50 years, we look forward to the records being made public this month and getting a confirmation.
According to a book by Ivan Tolstoy, The Laundered Manuscript, the CIA helped win Pasternak the Nobel Prize. Pasternak, better known as a poet in Soviet Russia, finished his novel, Dr. Zhivago in 1955. Set during the Russian Revolution, the famous love story espouses anti-Soviet ideals such as individualism and fighting against the politics and culture of the times. Pasternak realized that the novel could cause him serious problems in the Soviet Union and his wife, afraid of the gulag, urged him not to publish it.
However Pasternak sent the manuscript to Novy Mir, the State literary magazine. The government, according to records released in 2001, saw the manuscript as a threat:
Boris Pasternak’s novel is a malicious libel of the USSR,” wrote Soviet Foreign Minister Dmitry Shepilov in an August 1956 memo to members of the Central Committee of the Communist Party. In a memo of its own, the KGB offered the opinion that “a typical feature of his work is estrangement from Soviet life and a celebration of individualism.”
Pasternak also shared the manuscript with Sergio D’ Angelo, a Moscow-based Italian radio broadcaster and acquaintance of Italian publisher, Giangiacomo Feltrinelli, who was also a member of the communist party. The author also gave typed copies to Isaiah Berlin, the British philosopher and to a French specialist in Slavic Studies Helene Peltier.
The communist party pressured Feltrinelli not to publish the book, even forcing Pasternak to write telegrams urging him not to go forward. However Pasternak did manage to send secret letters assuring the publisher that these telegrams were not sincere. In one such letter, he wrote
how happy he was that the Italian was not “fooled by those idiotic and brutal appeals accompanied by my signature (!), a signature all but false and counterfeit insofar as it was extorted from me by a blend of fraud and violence.” (more…)